Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Macro Sniper Report's avatar

The source of the constraint matters to me.

Self Constraint is the way to true freedom in my opinion.

I free myself from the suffocation of choice by eliminating options that would not benefit my path towards who I want to be.

And after all, freedom for me comes down to chosing who I want to be.

My perception, my thoughts and my actions are a mere reflection of who I am.

If I want to be a Free Person, I still have to constrain myself, to not be a slave to my impulses.

What I find puzzling is how to define freedom at all. It will probably different to everyone.

Expand full comment
Smithers's avatar

Using the Epicurus quote from the stack I think beautifully illustrates Stoic principles when adapted:

"To live under constraint is a misfortune, but there is no constraint to live under constraint."

When we replace the 1st & Last "constraint" with other concepts, the wisdom becomes even more powerful:

"To live under piety is a misfortune, but there is no constraint to live under piety."

"To live under anger is a misfortune, but there is no constraint to live under anger."

While I can't claim credit for this insight (I encountered it while reading about Stoic ideals on another forum), I find it remarkable how it captures the core Stoic principle of perspective. We have the power to free ourselves from any circumstance by choosing how we respond to our situations and emotional impulses.

The beauty lies in recognising that while external circumstances may create suffering, we're never truly forced to remain trapped by them. this short article is a great reminder of this I shall be re-reading it every no and then :)

What are your thoughts on this interpretation?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts